Clear Moral Objectives
Lynn Woolley
$27.95
Hardback
257 pages
Eakin Press
P.O. Box 90159
Austin, Texas 78709-0159
http://www.BeLogical.com

In a world where “up is down, black is white, and right is wrong,” it’s refreshing to hear a voice such as Lynn Woolley’s echoing across the talk radio airwaves. For those of us who don’t get to hear his show each day, even better is the fact that his third book, Clear Moral Objective, is now available from Eakin Press. What makes this collection of essays so important is that they remind us, in very uncompromising terms, that there is an alternative to the maddening swirl of lunacy which currently occupies our society.

The strength of this book lies in Woolley’s courage to logically confront each specific issue instead of tiptoeing around them; which, due to rampant political correctness, seems to increasingly be the order of the day. A case in point is chapter one where he addresses the language used by abortionists to neutralize their abysmal practices. Thus, instead of calling the unborn child a “baby,” these individuals have very calculatedly termed it a “fetus” to reduce the emotional impact.

Likewise, Woolley gives us a rare look at the different procedures that are actually used to perform abortions. During one procedure, the baby is dismembered inside the womb and disposed of piece-by-piece. In another display of grotesque inhumanity, the doctor sticks a syringe filled with a salt solution into the fluid surrounding the baby, subsequently killing it. This tactic is similar to another where lethal drugs are injected into the mother’s amniotic fluid, causing her to ‘dispose of’ the baby once it gasps its last breath. But none compare to the savagery of partial birth abortion where a fully-formed child is removed from the mother’s womb (feet first), then a doctor jabs a pair of scissors through its temple. If that ghastly image isn’t enough to cause severe revulsion, the doctor then sticks a vacuum sweeper-style hose into the child’s bloody skull and sucks out its brains. Despite the pure evil of such an act, both Bill and Hillary Clinton unwaveringly support this elective surgery.

Although President Bush and the Congress recently outlawed this practice, our commander-in-chief has refused to make abortion a front burner issue. As Woolley points out, “that means no leadership, no educating the masses from the bully pulpit, no forward movement toward protecting the unborn, and no representation for people like Gianna Jensen [the nineteen-year-old victim of a botched abortion].” Our Republican senators and representatives are no better, for they too have failed to push the abortion issue in any meaningful way. Their hypocrisy is blinding, because for years they blamed the Democrats for their inability to make abortion illegal. But now, ever since the mid-term elections of 2002, Republicans have controlled the House, Senate, and the Executive Office. Yet all of these supposedly ‘conservative’ men and women have been timidly silent on this topic. Why? Even if they outlawed this practice and a suit was immediately filed with the Supreme Court, at least they would have made a stand by sending an undeniable message – we’re not going to tolerate this practice any longer.

In an equally riveting fashion, Woolley confronts our government’s pork barrel spending and heavy-handed taxation system. For example, he shows how the Energy Department has 15,600 full-time employees, yet sports 16, 351 vehicles – more than one car or truck for every single worker. Even more troubling is the practice of corporate welfare where our legislators gave McDonald’s $1.6 million to advertise their chicken nuggets in Singapore. These same giveaways go to Amoco, IBM, GM, GE, AT&T, and Citicorp (among many others).

But our convoluted tax system takes the cake in regard to problematic areas in our federal government. As Lynn Woolley so insightfully writes, “The income tax is government’s way of controlling the behavior of business and individuals.” He continues by saying that this is the way “government maintains its stranglehold over our paychecks and our lives.” Please let these words resonate for a moment, especially in terms of the everyday taxpayer who wants to fight this system. According to the author:

      - our tax code contains over 8 million words
      - there are 569 different tax forms
      - our federal tax books contain 25 volumes totaling 52,310 pages

The book’s finest passage quite possibly is: “Suppose employers were no longer required to be tax collectors? If the American wage-earner had to pull out his or her checkbook and actually write a check to the IRS, the realization of how taxed we are would set in. Then the amount would be significant enough that the average person would begin to wonder what the government does with all that cash.”

There are plenty of other highlights in Clear Moral Objectives, such as examinations of multiculturalism, political correctness, ‘verbal gridlock’, how the FBI has infiltrated certain groups in the past to discredit and divide them, and an eye-opening account of Kwanzaa ‘inventor’ Ronald Everett. In this light, Woolley is unmatched in his ability to separate the wheat from the chaff and expose those negative elements that are bringing this country down. And in all honesty, most of us are fully aware of how a handful of special interest groups such as the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), NEA (National Education Association), ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), ADL (Anti-Defamation League), NOW (National Organization of Women), the Rainbow Coalition, and the academic elite are pushing an agenda that is far removed from those of everyday American citizens.

With this in mind, I feel that Lynn Woolley should use this foundation as the premise for a follow-up book which examines the true sources that are using the above-mentioned groups to divide-and-conquer the people of this fine country. What specifically do I mean? Well, one of the biggest pratfalls that many of us fall into is the Symptom-Cause scenario. In other words, if a person is continually coughing, they go out and buy cough drops or cough syrup to make the problem go away (at least temporarily). But in reality, their cough is merely a SYMPTOM for a much deeper CAUSE; possibly bronchitis, a lung infection, or even cancer. But by merely addressing the symptom, they never get any deeper insights or understanding into where the real maladjustment lies (or an ultimate solution).

Likewise, the NOW, ADL, ACLU, ADL, and NAACP are merely front-groups that “implement” the divide-and-conquer agenda of the truly sinister devils behind them. What Woolley should now do is expose the powers behind the veil who are the true CAUSE of our social and economic deterioration.

And who, precisely, should we be blaming? Well, the most divisive force in America today is the corporate-controlled mass media. I say this because, if anyone took the time to research this subject, they’d realize that nearly every storyline and article relayed by newspapers, magazines, talk radio shows, and network newscasters focus on the following concepts: race, class, gender, religion, age, political party, or sexual preference. Think about it: white vs. black, rich vs. poor, men vs. women, Christian vs. Hindu, old vs. young, Democrat vs. Republican, or straight vs. gay (plus plenty of other derivatives). The motive behind this tactic is clear: the more they can get everyday people all around the world to fight with each other, the less apt they’ll be to aim their derision at the true enemy – the moneyed, controlling Globalist elite.

The most resounding question at this point should be: who are the people directing our mass media who are either laying pure filth on us, or are orchestrating this divide-and-conquer scenario? The answer can be found in an examination of media ownership. One excellent source is our book, The New World Order Illusion (chapter 11), while another is a March 10, 2003 speech given by Michael Collins Piper at the Zayed Centre for Coordination and Follow-Up. During this presentation, Piper pointed out that, “Pro-Israel Jewish families and/or financial interests control all three of the major news magazines: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report, not to mention both major national daily newspapers – The Washington Post and The New York Times. In addition, every one of the major television networks is dominated by Jewish financial interests.”

Piper then delivers the following quotes from a variety of different sources:

Jewish-American writer Joel Kotkin in his book, Tribes

“Jews clearly possess a disproportionate influence in movies, publishing, advertising and theater. In the media, according to one survey in the 1970s, one quarter of the leading figures were Jewish, more than ten times their percentage in the general population.”

J.J. Goldberg in his book, Jewish Power: Inside the Jewish Establishment

“It is true that Jews are represented in the media business in numbers far out of proportion to their share of the population. Studies have shown that while Jews make up little more than 5 percent of the working press nationwide – hardly more than their share of the population – they make up one fourth or more of the writers, editors, and producers in America’s “elite media,” including network news divisions, the top news weeklies and the four leading daily newspapers (New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal).”

Eugene Fisher, director of Catholic-Jewish Relations for the National Conference of Catholic Bishops

“If there is Jewish power, it’s the power of the word, the power of Jewish columnists and Jewish opinion makers. The Jewish community is a very literate community, and it has a lot to say. And if you can shape opinion, you can shape events.”

J.J. Goldberg writing about Jewish predominance in the Hollywood film industry

“Hollywood at the end of the twentieth century is still an industry with a pronounced ethnic tinge. Virtually all the senior executives at the major studios are Jews. Writers, producers, and to a lesser degree directors are disproportionately Jewish – one recent study showed the figure as high as 59 percent among top-grossing films. The combined weight of so many Jews in one of America’s most lucrative and important industries gives the Jews of Hollywood a great deal of political power.”

Charles Silberman, author of A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today and Crisis in the Classroom

“In 1982, Jews made up a little less than 6 percent of the national press corps as a whole but 25 to 30 percent of the “media elite” – those working for the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal; for Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report; and for the news divisions of CBS, NBC, ABC, and the Public Broadcasting System and its leading stations.”

Silberman adds

“Jews are equally influential, if less well known, in the management of television news. It is the network correspondents, of course, who have become household names, among them Jews. The greatest concentration of Jews, however, is at the producer level – and it is the producers who decide which stories will go on the air, and how long, and in what order they will run. In 1982, before a shift in assignments, the producers of all three evening newscasts were Jewish, as were the executive producers of CBS’s 60 Minutes and ABC’s 20/20. And Jews were almost equally prominent at their “senior producer” and “broadcast producer” levels as well as in senior management.”

In the end, we need to ask ourselves: why is the Jewish power-structure so intent on flooding our culture with the crap that comes from groups like the NAACP, NOW, NEA, ADL, and the ACLU (most oftentimes with a positive spin on it)? If their interests were truly that of empowering the American people, they would denounce these organizations and their messages in a heartbeat. But instead, they serve as champions for their destructive agendas. Why? Can the answer be found in the overall Globalist plan that has, as its ultimate end, the eradication of our once strong, moral country?

A very pertinent, topical example is Mel Gibson’s movie, The Passion of Christ, which is a Gospels-based representation of Jesus’ crucifixion. Who, though, may I ask are the primary groups opposed to this virtuous movie? Answer: Jewish groups such as the ADL and the Simon Wiesenthal Center. And, being that Gibson is delivering his portrayal in the form of a movie, who, may I ask, founded Hollywood, and who still runs Hollywood today? Answer: the Jews. NO other groups are protesting this movie other than them. Why? What are they afraid of? And more importantly, why do they have a problem with this movie, yet have no trouble distributing a slew of cinematic sewer droppings that abound with pornography and anti-Christian messages?

The ultimate answer can be found in a recent event which shook this country to its core: Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky. And even though Party Boy Bill lied through his teeth, shamed his family, and brought disgrace to the Presidency; the worst sins were committed by those lurking behind-the-scenes, for they’re the one’s who truly promoted an agenda to remove Absolutes from our collective consciousness. Y’see, being that the Globalist-controllers represent pure evil, they don’t want there to be any Absolutes in our culture – right vs. wrong, true vs. false, etc. So, with Bill Clinton as their vehicle, they clouded our minds with these “gray areas” as to whether Clinton actually committed adultery, whether he really had sex with ‘that woman,’ and so forth.

But there aren’t any gray areas. Bill Clinton is a sexual predator (and has been all his professional life) who cheated on his wife when he had sex with Monica Lewinsky, Jennifer Flowers, and scores of other women. Case closed. But to this day, there are still people who will argue these points. So, by creating these “gray areas” and chipping away at our foundation of Absolutes, what the Controllers are ultimately trying to do is abolish Christianity itself (the source of absolutes).

To close, I applaud Lynn Woolley’s book, Clear Moral Objectives, and suggest that every person reading this review purchase a copy. In the same breath, though, I highly urge Mr. Woolley to follow-up his efforts on both his radio show and in print by exposing the truly evil power behind what he has outlined in this book. The truth of the matter goes much deeper than simple “front groups” who can easily be made into scapegoats. As it stands now, Woolley’s work is only half-done, and I hope that he can see the “clear moral objective” in getting at the CAUSE of our problems, not merely the SYMPTOMS.