There are two types of political leaders in the world today: Globalists and Nationalists.

Globalists do the bidding of international bankers, multi-national corporations, and one world-type organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Nationalists, on the other hand, have as their primary goal the best interests of the citizens they represent in their particular country.

George Bush Jr. is a Globalist.
Bill Clinton is a Globalist.
George Bush Sr. is a Globalist.
Ronald Reagan wasn’t a Globalist, but regrettably his cabinet was filled with those who were Globalists.
Jimmy Carter is a Globalist.
Gerald Ford is a Globalist.
Richard Nixon wasn’t a Globalist, but Henry Kissinger was, and after the Watergate house of cards fell, we saw who was left standing.
Lyndon Johnson was a Zionist-controlled lackey.
John F. Kennedy was the last American president to overtly buck the Globalist system, and we all know what happened to him.

So, when you look at the political world around us and scratch your head at some of the recent decisions George Bush Jr. has been making, please keep this very vital distinction in mind. George Bush is a Globalist. If you don’t believe me, here are a few quick examples of where his loyalties lie.

Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants and the Opening of America’s Borders

An overtly Globalist technique used to break down a country’s borders, erode its national sovereignty, and bring a more dominant country’s standard-of-living down to that of the ‘lesser’ country.

The Upcoming Free Trade of the Americas Agreement

Similar to how NAFTA and GATT have decimated this country’s manufacturing base, this treaty will be the final nail in our coffin. George Bush fully supports and promotes it. And to those who haven’t noticed, China is now the world’s slave factory, and whatever they don’t make, other third world countries do. Goodbye C-Cor, goodbye Corning, goodbye Murata, goodbye Cerro, goodbye …

Rampant Deficit Spending and a Lack of Fiscal Conservatism

Since the Federal Reserve is a privately owned for-profit corporation, and a host of international bankers are its primary shareholders, the more money we borrow from them, the more we are required to pay in interest. This is free, easy money for the banking elite, and as our deficits continue to soar, the interest payments continually eat up a larger portion of the overall federal budget.

Perpetual War

As you will see in our upcoming book, The New World Order Illusion, since America possesses the world’s largest military might, we are being used as nothing more than pawns to do the Globalists’ dirty work by securing their energy and financial needs. In the process, guess who loses more lives, spends increasingly beyond their means, and goes further into debt each year – us or them?

The United Nations

Despite what he says publicly, George W. Bush is an ardent supporter of the U.N., as are his father and the vast majority of his cabinet. If you doubt this statement, please consider an excerpt from our upcoming book, The New World Order Illusion:

======================================================================

The Bush family is as PRO-U.N. as any entity on the planet, even though they erect a façade that they are against this organization. If you need proof, read the following words very carefully. “It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” (Editor’s note: I thought we pledged our allegiance to the American flag, or the Constitution, or the Bill of Rights.)

Who uttered this vile quote to the U.N. General Assembly on February 1, 1996? It was none other than Trilateral Commission member, Knight of Malta, Skull & Bonesman and ex-CIA director George Bush Sr. But that’s not the end of the story, because the nut doesn’t fall far from the tree. Even though George W. Bush Jr. has apparently staked himself in opposition to the U.N., we need to ask ourselves a few very important questions.

First, which recent president urged the Congress to pay all of our U.N. back dues? Answer: George W. Bush.

Who has placed the United States back into a fiasco-riddled U.N. agency known as UNESCO – a program we’ve been luckily free from for two decades? Answer: George W. Bush.

Who has convinced our senators to fork over billions of dollars to other U.N.-affiliated programs or organizations like the Millennium Challenge Account, the World Bank, and the African AIDS Program? Answer: George W. Bush.

Finally, if President Bush was actually anti-U.N., why doesn’t he simply put his money where his mouth is and pull out of this Globalist organization once and for all? With the U.S. effectively OUT, it would dismantle this institution in a heartbeat. But guess what; we’re still IN.

If this circumstantial evidence isn’t enough to sway your opinion, how about a few quotes that came directly from George W. Bush’s own mouth? (Source: William F. Jasper’s Behind the Deception)

“I want the United Nations to be effective. It makes sense for there to be an international body that has got the backbone and capacity to help keep the peace.”

“We want the resolutions of the world’s most important multilateral body to be enforced.”

“I want the United Nations to be effective. It’s important for it to be a robust, capable body.”

“The conduct of the Iraqi regime is a threat to the authority of the United Nations.” (Editor’s note: I thought Mr. Bush said Iraq’s actions were a direct threat to America, not the U.N.)

“Our message to the world is that we want the U.N. to succeed.”

Now, does this sound like someone who is opposed to the U.N.? Another quote from William F. Jasper’s previously-mentioned article takes this notion one step further: “Professor Robert Wright, an avowed advocate of world government, notes that Bush has given the U.N. a prominence it has rarely enjoyed in its 57-year history. In fact, said Wright in a New York Times piece earlier this year, there remains a slim chance that the president could, however paradoxically, emerge as a historic figure in the United Nations’ own evolution toward enduring significance.” He continues, “The Bush administration’s pressure on the U.N. to enforce its resolutions is making it easier for the U.N. to claim the authority to do so, and to call on the U.S. to provide it with the military muscle to do just that. By leading the charge on this issue, Bush is making it more difficult for fellow Republicans to oppose U.N. empowerment – just as, decades earlier, Nixon’s trip to Beijing made it more difficult for fellow Republicans to oppose opening U.S. relations with Communist China.”

Everyone knows what a sticky economic situation we’re in right now with the Chinese (specifically in relation to our declining manufacturing base and huge trade deficit). Will George Bush’s actions in Iraq and his contradictory stance toward the U.N. open similar floodgates of trouble for the U.S.? The writing is on the wall, especially when William Jaspers quotes his colleague, William Norman Grigg, who wrote in a March 24, 2003 article entitled Same Ends, Different Means that, “The president and his subordinates have made their intent transparently clear: the impending war on, or occupation of, Iraq is intended to carry out the U.N. Security Council’s mandates, not to protect our nation or to punish those responsible for the September 11th attack. The war would uphold the U.N.’s supposed authority and vindicate its role as a de facto world government.”

Folks, these are very hard-hitting, important words that we should not take lightly, especially when coupled with another passage from Grigg’s article Baghdad Bait-and-Switch where he warns, “The protracted occupation of Iraq would result in a steady and worsening hemorrhage of natural power, wealth, and prestige leading to a situation in which American servicemen and their families, weary of the burden of empire, would eagerly embrace transferring that burden to the U.N. – a radically empowered U.N. boasting its own standing military.”

What these writers are doing is connecting the dots behind our war in Iraq (and beyond). Please be aware, because what you’re seeing on CNN, Fox, or CBS regarding President Bush is not the truth. Rather, take a look at what those in the know have to say. Specifically, Mr. James M. Lindsay wrote in Foreign Affairs: “Both Al Gore and George W. Bush are internationalists by inclination.” [For those of you who don’t know, Foreign Affairs is the official publication of the extremely powerful New World Order-oriented Council on Foreign Relations, while James Lindsay works for the left-leaning pro-one-world government Brookings Institute.]

The veil is being pulled back, and the picture that has emerged is not a pretty one, especially when we consider this final quote from William F. Jasper’s article Behind the Deception: “Lindsay and the crew at Foreign Affairs were not merely guessing at George W.’s inclinations. They knew that his father is a devoted internationalist and a former CFR member. Just as important, they knew that candidate Bush had surrounded himself with advisers who were (and are) CFR stalwarts, many of whom had served in the first Bush administration: Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney, Stephen Hadley, Richard Perle, George Shultz, Paul Wolfowitz, Dov Zakheim, Robert Zoellick, Elliot Abrams, Colin Powell, Henry Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft, et al. They also knew for certain that the new Bush administration would end up taking a pro-U.N., multilateralist course – even if it had to march under a false America First, unilateralist banner in order to get patriots onto the one-world bandwagon. Unfortunately, too many patriots still don’t realize they’re being taken for a ride.”

======================================================================

I could continue with additional examples, but I think you get the picture. Now, is what I’m writing ‘conspiracy theory’ as some people label it? Not a chance. This is the reality of our current political situation whether we like it or not. Thus, the first question you have to ask yourself is: why aren’t CNN, CBS, FOX, NBC, and ABC alerting us to these very important distinctions between Globalists and Nationalists? The answer is simple: each and every one of these news organizations is owned by a Globalist corporation, and it isn’t in their best interest to inform people of what’s really taking place behind the scenes.

Before I let you guys go for the day, I would like to let you know that I’m not writing these words because I’m a Bush-bashing looney-liberal. Instead, I’m a registered Republican, and in the 2000 presidential election I voted for a true conservative – Pat Buchanan – who is undoubtedly a Nationalist that would have ripped the NAFTA agreement to shreds and sent this new immigration bill back where it belongs – the crapper.

Anyway, I can tell by listening to your show each day that all four of you – Kevin, Jeff, Tor and Dave – not only love this country, but are also very concerned about its future. In this sense, if we want to save our nation before it’s too late, we need to start talking about this subject and letting people know what’s really going on. George Bush is willfully and decidedly selling America down the drain. Regrettably - and this poses a very real problem – our alternative on the Democratic ticket (whoever that will be) is not any better, especially if it turns out to be the devil’s own daughter, Hillary Clinton. [As a side-note, if John Kerry gets the Democratic nomination, we will have two Yale secret society Skull & Bones alumni running against each other. Talk about a scary notion.]

So, what are we to do? I’m certainly not trying to tell you how to run your show, but we can’t just gloss over these issues any longer, for as Edmund Burke once said, “All that’s necessary for the forces of evil to win in the world is for enough good men to do nothing.”

Keep up the good work, and give ‘em hell guys!