Purpose: I am forwarding this information for one (and only one) reason: for decades the mainstream corporate media has been lying, withholding information, duping and bamboozling the American public about a host of governmental crimes. These include the Oklahoma City Bombing, 9-11, TWA Flight 800, and many others. If the charges in Ms. Mackris' lawsuit against Bill O'Reilly are accurate, it will show once-and-for-all what these individuals are made of. On the other hand, if they are proven false, I still see O'Reilly getting what he deserves (call it bad karma), for like no other man in this country, he has established himself as "being on our side" and "looking out for the little guy." But the sorry truth is: O'Reilly hasn't done anything to destroy the grand illusion, and has instead perpetuated it like so many others in the controlled press. I feel these deliberate actions are inexcusable, and unless he truly exposes the power elite, I cannot forgive him. These guys (Rush Limbaugh with his illegal oxycontin, Bill Clinton's sexual predator habits, Dick Morris's toe-sucking fetish, and Mike Gallagher's pathological lying) deserve everything they get; and it's about time we quit placing them on such a pedestal. They lie to us, they're creeps, they're selling our country down the drain; and in the immortal words of the American Free Press: the media is the enemy. That's why I'm writing this piece. If all of us held their feet to the fire, they wouldn't get away with their shenanigans so easily.

Warning: Content is sexually explicit. Must be 18 years of age to read. If such material offends you, please do not read any further.

In all honesty, I’d much rather be writing about a lawsuit filed against Bill O’Reilly that indicted him for not telling the truth about 9-11. But since no such cases are forthcoming, I’ll focus instead on the lurid legal papers recently filed on October 13, 2004 in the New York State Supreme Court by Andrea Mackris, an associate producer for The O’Reilly Factor.

Before delving into this 24-page document, though, I would like to point out two important points:

1) According to court papers, the woman in question – 33 year old Andrea Mackris – was on the fast path to a highly successful career in the television news business, earning nearly a six-figure salary at Fox News. In fact, on different occasions she was told by Bill O’Reilly:

          a) “stick with me and I’ll take care of you”
          b) “you have a bright career ahead of you”
          c) and "the second floor (alluding to Fox management) liked her"

Additionally, she was the only Fox staffer assigned to the Republican National Convention with a full-access pass, and even interviewed Hillary Clinton on August 29, 2004. My question is: why would a woman with everything going for her throw it all away and try to “extort $60 million” from Bill O’Reilly and Fox News? If her allegations were flimsy or unprovable, this would be an example of career suicide at its most extreme.

2) In her court documents, there are specific dates for every allegation, plus lengthy transcripts which indicate that many of the conversations between her and Bill O’Reilly may have been tape-recorded.

With that said, the specific allegations leveled against Bill O’Reilly, the Fox News Channel, 20th Century Fox, and Westwood One are as follows:

          “sexual harassment which created and maintained a virulent, hostile work environment           through explicit, rampant, pervasive and continued sex discrimination which was so           offensive and severe that it detrimentally altered the terms and conditions of the           plaintiff’s employment.”

Now, I could continue this article with page-after-page of legalese, but at this point let’s get to the down-and-dirty of Ms. Mackris’ lawsuit. In other words, what does she allege that Bill O’Reilly is all about?

For starters, it seems that Mr. O’Reilly has an unquenchable penchant for phone sex. This fetish is so pervasive that it is cited on at least NINE different occasions in the lawsuit. The plaintiff also alleges that Mr. O’Reilly begged her on one occasion to engage in this act with him, and also bragged about doing it with other young women.

Secondly, the legal papers point out that O’Reilly is fixated with vibrators, and also female masturbation. What follows are some excerpts:

1) O’Reilly to Mackris: “Just use your vibrator to blow off steam.” When the plaintiff reddened, O’Reilly asked lewdly, “What, you’ve got a vibrator don’t you? Every girl does.” When the Plaintiff responded indignantly, “No, they don’t. Does your wife?” O’Reilly replied, “Yes, in fact she does. She’d kill me if she knew I was telling you.”

2) “O’Reilly informed Mackris that he advised another woman to purchase a vibrator, and had taught that woman how to masturbate while telling her sexual stories over the telephone.”

3) “The Defendant suggested that Mackris purchase a vibrator. When the Plaintiff became embarrassed and told him she was not interested, O’Reilly again suggested: we should do it together. I could coach you through it.”

4) O’Reilly “suggested that Mackris purchase a vibrator and name it, and that he had one shaped like a cock with a little battery in it that a woman had given him. It became apparent that the Defendant was maturbating as he spoke.” (emphasis added)

5) As a climax, “During the course of Defendant Bill O’Reilly’s sexual rant, it became clear that he was using a vibrator upon himself, and that he ejaculated.” (emphasis added)

Lastly, during the course of this 24-page document, Mackris claims that O’Reilly:

          - “alluded to having a ménage a trios with the Plaintiff and her friend”
          - “lost his virginity to a girl in a car at JFK”
          - attended sex shows in Thailand
          - had “extra-marital dalliances with “hot” Italian women”
          - “suggested that he would perform oral sex upon Andrea Mackris, and that she would              start to perform fellatio upon his ‘big cock’”

If these passages aren’t disturbing enough, what really leaps out at the reader are Bill O’Reilly’s chest-thumping exhibitions of power:

Passage One

When the Plaintiff reminded the Defendant that he had done the same thing to other women who worked on The O’Reilly Factor, and that he should be careful or they might tell someone, O’Reilly vehemently threatened her with words to the effect:

“If any woman ever breathed a word I’ll make her pay so dearly that she’ll wish she’d never been born. I’ll take her through the mud, bring up things in her life and make her so miserable that she’ll be destroyed. And besides, she wouldn’t be able to afford the lawyers I can, or endure it financially as long as I can. And nobody would believe her. It’d be her word against mine, and who are they going to believe - me or some unstable woman making outrageous accusations? They’d see her as some psycho; someone unstable. Besides, I’d never make the mistake of picking unstable crazy girls like that.”

Passage Two

“If you cross Fox News Channel, it’s not just me; it’s Fox President Roger Ailes who will go after you. I’m the street guy out front making loud noises about the issues, but Ailes operates behind the scenes, strategizes and makes things happen so that one day BAM! The person gets what’s coming to them but never sees it coming. Look at Al Franken. One day he’s going to get a knock on his door and life as he’s known it will change forever. That day will happen; trust me.”

Passage Three

“During the course of this conversation, Defendant Bill O’Reilly bizarrely rambled further about Al Franken: “Ailes knows very powerful people and this goes all the way to the top.” The Plaintiff queried: “To the top of what?” The Defendant responded: “Top of the country. Just look at who’s on the cover of his book [Bush and Cheney]. They’re watching him and will be for years. [Al Franken’s] finished, and he’s going to be very sorry he ever took the Fox News Channel on.”

Lastly, here is what appears to be a final tape-recorded monologue where “Defendant O’Reilly informed the Plaintiff that he was watching a porn movie and babbled perversely regarding his fantasies concerning Carribean vacations":

“You would basically be in the shower and then I would come in and I’d join you and you would have your back to me and I would take that little loofa thing and kinda’ soap up your back … rub it all over you, get you to relax, hot water … and um … you know, you’d feel the tension drain out of you and uh you still would be with your back to me then I would kinda’ put my arm – it’s one of those mitts, those loofa mitts you know, so I got my hands in it … and I would put it around front, kinda’ rub your tummy a little bit with it, and then with my other hand I would start to massage your boobs, get your nipples really hard … ‘cuz I like that and you have really spectacular boobs …

"So anyway I’d be rubbing your big boobs and getting your nipples really hard, kinda’ kissing your neck from behind … and then I would take the other hand with the falafel (sic) thing and I’d put it on your pussy but you‘d have to do it really light, just kind of a tease business …”

CONCLUSION

Well, folks, there it is. Someday, unless this case is settled out-of-court, a panel of jurors will have to decide if Andrea Mackris is being truthful or not. What do you think?

Victor Thorn
www.wingtv.net
sisyphus1285@cs.com