As we progress through this labyrinth of international intrigue, one of the questions we naturally have to ask is: where does the New World Order fit into the picture? From my perspective, here is what I feel happened in regard to 9-11, Iraq, and potentially Iran.

First, the ruling elite ultimately want to reshape or reconfigure the Middle East into a European Union-style bloc of countries where all the sheikhs, kings, princes, and royal families will be replaced by globalist-oriented leaders. That was one of the primary reasons for World War I & II. The NWO had to eliminate the old-style ruling bodies (i.e. barons, the Ottoman Empire, etc) and put in place a host of puppet governments that stretched across the whole of Europe (see: The New World Order Exposed).

To accomplish this goal (and since those atop the control pyramid never do their own dirty work) they needed to recruit some bloodthirsty psychopaths and cut them a deal. Since they were fully aware of a Zionist-leaning cabal of “crazies” (as Ray McGovern called them) known as the neo-cons who got their feet wet during the Nixon administration, and then flourished during the Reagan and Bush Sr. terms, they approached them and said: we need a pretext for war – a new Pearl Harbor of sorts (to paraphrase Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington). It’ll be executed in New York City and Washington DC, and the theatrics will be larger than life in a Hollywood sort of way. We’ll call it “9-11,” and in return for your services, and to satisfy your innate bloodlust, we’ll let you lead the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and beyond.

Being that the international bankers are very pro-Zionist, as is the PNAC crowd, they figured Israel could also benefit from the resulting carnage and chaos. So, the die was cast for a “terrorist attack,” but guess what happened. The neo-cons blew it horribly, for the state-sponsored 9-11 terror attacks had more holes in them than a block of Swiss cheese. Worse, the neo-cons then turned the Iraqi war into such a debacle that now it’s nothing more than a grand embarrassment. It’s hard to tell if this disaster was intentional or not (ala Vietnam), but the only ones winning (as usual) are the bankers and defense contractors (because their blood isn’t being spilled).

But as I alluded to in the previous paragraph, this botched war may be precisely what the elite wanted all along. Either way (again, we mustn’t forget that the bankers always play both sides against the middle), the power-brokers ultimately win because if the United States war efforts were successful (the domino effect), then the Middle East would become a homogenous ‘union’ like the EU. On the other hand, if the U.S. blew it; well, the international bankers have been pushing toward a “multi-world order” for quite some time anyway.

Why? Because they hate too much power being concentrated in the hands of only one nation. [For that matter, they don’t even like the idea of nation-states or nationalism.] So, instead of having a dual super-power scenario as existed during the Cold War (U.S. & USSR), or a sole super-power right now (the U.S.), the NWO ultimately seeks a multi-world order with various ‘unions’ (i.e. the American Union, EU, Asian Union, African Union, Russian Union, etc).

To attain this end, they’ve been asking themselves: why do we need just one reserve currency (the dollar)? In this sense, if the days of U.S. dollar supremacy are over, then why not mitigate this transition to a multi-currency exchange by pricing oil in a unit other than the dollar.

Y’see, everyone thinks the NWO wants a one-world currency, but guess what – they already have it in the dollar. The problem for them is: it places too much power (and the potential for disaster) into one country’s hands. At some point in the future a true global currency may be introduced, but for the time being, the NWO is pushing for the concept of geographic “unions” with at least a dual currency. And even this approach may change with China’s rapid rise on the economic stage.

Since we’re speaking of alternative currencies, at the time of this writing, the value of the euro has increased against the dollar 13% since 2002. This fact is significant, especially when we consider that the EU imports more oil from OPEC than the U.S. does. Most people don’t know it, but America imports more oil from Canada than they do from any other nation (yet the neo-con talk show hosts constantly bash those “evil OPEC Arabs”). In addition, 45% of all Middle East imports are derived from the EU, while over 1/3 of all Iranian oil goes to Europe. Due to long-standing embargoes, NO Iranian oil is imported into the U.S.

So, it’s easy to see why the EU would be in favor of an Iranian oil bourse. They could cut the middleman (the U.S.) out of the picture and stop subsidizing us. The entity which is now on the bubble is England, for they’re straddling both sides of the fence. On the one hand, since there are only two oil exchanges in the world (NYMEX and IPE), with the latter being in London, a great deal of power and revenue rests in their hands with the current system. But if a new euro-based bourse is accepted worldwide, they will then be torn between the existing financial centers of NYC/DC and the new hub of Paris/Frankfurt.

There’s an old saying in our country: “As GM goes, so goes America. Well, in terms of geo-politics and petro-currencies, “As London goes, so goes the globe.” Right now, although the UK is part of the EU, they still maintain the “pound” as their official currency and have not switched over to the euro. But if the Bank of England-Royal Family-Rothschild cabal ever does switch to the euro, you’ll know that major changes are about to take place on the world stage.

Tomorrow: part four – War, and War Game scenarios