Over the past few years, a researcher named Killtown has been doing some intriguing work on 9-11, especially the anomalies surrounding Flight 93 and a woman named Val McClatchey.

All those who have studied the Shanksville Hoax know that Ms. McClatchey was the woman who produced a photograph of the infamous smoke plume which supposedly arose from the wreckage of Flight 93.

Of course the lack of debris (i.e. wings, fuselage, engines, luggage, etc) and bodies – not to mention the 10-12 foot crater that Flight 93 purportedly “vaporized” inside – have justifiably caused many to question the government’s official version of events. [For more information, see Phantom Flight 93]

Another element of this perplexing puzzle which has come under increasing scrutiny is Val McClatchey herself. In a series of articles regarding this woman, Killtown has uncovered a number of inconsistencies in her story. To view them, please click on these links:

Flight 93 Plume Photo Analysis
Val McClatchey Photo: More Smoking Guns, or Total Fraud?
The Flight 93 Crash Smoke Plume Photo

In all, I feel Killtown best sums-up this scenario of Flight 93 NOT crashing-landing in an abandoned Shanksville landmine with the following quote: “If it really was an ordnance blast not too far beyond the white barn … then this would be a true smoking gun and one of the clearest examples of complicity in the 9-11 attacks by the U.S. government because what else could have caused such a large explosion and who else would have been behind it?”

The question we all need to ask ourselves is: why are so many individuals in the 9-11 “truth movement” and alternative media ignoring this crucial information?