Try to imagine if your neighborhood didn’t have a police force – none whatsoever. Then one day an adjacent community called Zazafrack announced that in five years they were going to invade your hometown.

Now, with no standing police force, what would be the odds that you could thwart their advances? The answer, of course, is none.

To compensate for this glaring problem, what if a few individuals from various townships and boroughs tried to organize an action-oriented defense force to fend-off the invaders? But every time they tried to get people together as a whole, everyone else either said:

               - rallying for a common cause was ineffective,
               - they couldn’t find the time, or
               - they actually denounced your efforts.

Plus, what if practically every member of your local media – those in a position to mobilize the citizenry – refused to help in any form of organization?

How effective do you think you’d be when Zazafrack’s intruders stormed across your city limits and through your streets? You’d be trounced, and most certainly lose the battle at hand.

With this scenario in mind, let’s turn our attention to the patriot movement. Of all the various groups in existence across our country, the patriot movement without a doubt has less organization, less mobilization, and the least formalized game-plan of any other in existence.

Think about it: the government is organized, as is the CIA, military, mainstream media, illegal aliens, blacks, women, gays, abortion groups (pro and con), gun owners, bankers, oil companies, Israelis, unions, the peace movement, lawyers, doctors, and thousands of others. Hell, even pro bowlers and your local chess club are more organized than we are.

The big question is: why?

Some of the most prominent members of this movement have been on the radio or running websites for over a decade, and yet we have NO ORGANIZATION! Zero. What have they been doing all this time?

Now, do you think it’s any accident that the people who are most knowledgeable about the New World Order are also the least organized? Or, do you think certain influential alternative media figures have been deliberately put in place to prevent any type of organization?

Hmmm, it makes one scratch one’s head, huh; especially when you consider that those who’ve seen through the NWO’s illusion are also the most potentially dangerous to the global elite.

On this note, do you think that the government-plutocrats have any vested interest in keeping us unorganized, and do you think they would deliberately put in place individuals and groups to keep us unorganized? Considering their past modus operandi, the possibility of such an occurrence is highly likely. Also, do you think it’s a stretch to conclude that those in the alternative media who have most adamantly refused to organize could also be the ones selected to thwart or curtail any type of mobilization?

It certainly makes one wonder, especially when these individuals never partake in or promote activism, rallies, or protests. Some of them have never even been seen in public before. If those at the forefront of the alternative media don't want to be a part of direct 9-11 activism, then how can they call themselves a leader of anything; for isn't a leader supposed to be a person of action?

Of course, these very same individuals will keep repeating the mantra that they’re “educating” people. But as a writer recently wrote in a V for Vendetta review: “In all of man's history freedom has never been attained by ideas alone.” Likewise, as we’ve said many times before on WING TV, knowledge without action is useless. Look at it this way: if you knew that somebody was going to burn your house down, but you didn’t do anything about it, what good would the knowledge be? Your head would be filled with ideas while you stared at a pile of charred rubble.

Now that we’ve realized how peculiar our situation is, it certainly is possible to change that scenario, isn’t it? I mean, if there’s zero possibility of winning a battle (i.e. against the NWO) without organization; then wouldn’t the first logical course of action be to get organized? It seems like a good place to start, doesn’t it? After all, we definitely don’t have five years to lollygag around and “wait for something to happen.”

So, maybe it's time to see what this “movement” is made of. September 11, 2006 will mark five years since an inside job terror attack was waged upon our nation; therefore this anniversary is a big one. Don't you think it would be a step in the right direction if we all rallied together for this one day and showed unity for our cause? I mean, if we can’t even come together for ONE DAY (and a momentous one at that) at Ground Zero in New York City, then what the hell will we ever become unified for? When we publicly confront the lies of 9-11, we are, in essence, confronting ALL their lies.

And just so there’s no confusion, this call for action isn’t being done to benefit any single person or organization, it's not about a "centralization of power," and it isn’t being done to make money. Rather, it’s simply to show that yes, we too can become organized like practically every other group in the world.

To do our part, we’re going to e-mail this article to every member of the alternative media that we can think of, and post it in as many forums and message boards as possible to create awareness.

The biggest variable right now is: who else in the alternative media will help in these efforts to get us organized? If no one does, then it’s time to face a very stark reality: you are akin to the sitting-duck sheeple neighborhood mentioned above that had no mobilization whatsoever. And when the hammer finally came down, guess what happened. They lost!

Is that what you want from the “leaders” in your alternative media? If so, then don’t encourage them to do anything and your destiny will be sealed (and I guarantee, it won’t be a pretty picture).

Time is of the essence, and when the next "9-11" strike takes place, there won't be any more second chances. Excuses don't work anymore; it's now or never.