![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
|
Jeff Rense's Censorship "Damage Control" by Victor Thorn & Lisa Guliani |
|
As one e-mailer said to Rense: “What scares you so much about these people that you would go to these extremes in composition, content, and tone? There is nothing even vaguely, what one might consider, ‘journalistic’ about this disjointed blather. Are you even aware of this? Are you experiencing a nervous breakdown, Jeff? Please seek professional counsel, if so.” Worse, Jeff Rense couldn’t even muster the courage to put his own name on the article he wrote! Does this peculiar stance somehow fit in with the disguises he always wears (i.e. wig, fake moustache, glasses, etc)? Here’s what another person wrote about Rense becoming exactly the same as the mainstream media: “Just like the big editors, Rense feels the need to do people’s thinking for them, judging what information people need in order to maintain … well, maintain what? Rense is in the realm of tyrants, information ministers, and churches.” By CENSORING information before you have a chance to read it, what Rense and others of his ilk are doing is saying that YOU aren’t smart enough to decide for yourself what is pertinent, so they’ll be your FILTERS and do it for you. How do you like that “public service” that Rense is performing for you? As Lisa Guliani always says, “Whenever anybody lies to you, they assume that you’re stupid.” Overt censorship is a form of deceit because they’re removing, deleting, and/or omitting information without telling you they’re doing so. Thus, if you accept their censorship, then you’re proving them right – you are stupid – akin to the bumbling fools who bow-down to televangelists and think they can do no wrong. Is that what you want to be – a blind-faith televangelist groupie? Even Douglas Herman, author of the article originally censored by Rense, admitted the following in Rense’s own article: “Remarkably, I have been less censored by Internet bloggers, like Jeff Rense and Doug Thompson, than the mainstream media, which suppresses me altogether.” So, what he’s saying is that Rense DOES censor him, just not as much as the mainstream media does! Still, we can never forget that censorship to any degree is completely unacceptable. Another way Rense and Company try to dupe you is with this mantra: Patriots never criticize other patriots. Well, once again Rense is wrong, as one of our viewers pointed out: “I gather that Rense isn’t familiar with how many of the Founding Fathers hated each other.” The original patriots were oftentimes at each others throats; and yes, they did expose one another when wrong-doings were committed (as well they should have). What does Jeff Rense think we should do: turn a blind eye to wrong-doing? That's what the MAINSTREAM media does! It seems peculiar that Rense keeps wanting us to emulate those who are our enemy. Why is that? Think about this notion for a moment. Right is right and wrong is wrong under any circumstance, regardless of the arena in which it takes place. So: So, are we to believe that CENSORSHIP is wrong everywhere else in the world except the alternative media? What kind of rationale or backward reasoning is that? It seems like someone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes if you accept that con-job. Can’t you see? It’s the oldest trick in the book whenever someone repeats a mantra like: “Patriots never criticize patriots because it will hurt the movement.” But who are the ones always making this statement? Answer: The ones engaging in censorship, disinformation, money-grubbing, fear-mongering, suppression, and outright lying. And why do they constantly tell you to never criticize anyone in the “patriot movement?” Because it’s in their best interest to do so! They don’t want to be exposed. It’s simple psychology. They don't want you to see how they're manipulating you. By perpetuating this constant mantra (just like the government and mainstream media do via their conditioning), they’re BRAINWASHING you!!!!! Don’t be so gullible. The only thing they’re trying to do is cover their tracks. Don’t fall for their games, because they’re the same tactics the government uses on their CNN-FOX News audiences. Last but not least, Jeff Rense talks about being a patriot, but shouldn’t a TRUE PATRIOT bring every available bit of information to the table for their “movement” to digest, regardless of how they personally feel about an individual? Remember, the Founding Fathers had many heated battles, but they still unified against their common enemy. But look at what information Jeff Rense (and others) have routinely suppressed in regard to WING TV, thus preventing valuable truths from reaching a wider audience: Scholars for 9-11 Truth Press Conference And this is just for starters. So, ask yourself: since Jeff Rense likes to talk about “real” patriots; is this what a REAL PATRIOT would do --- blatantly suppress vital information from the public? ============================ What follows is a letter from 9-11 researcher Vinnie Sammartino about how Jeff Rense has resorted to name-calling (once again) by referring to WING TV as “Chicken Wings”: Chicken WINGs Clucking And Flapping Again I can't speak for the rest of America, but I personally like Chicken Wings Hot! In fact, the bigger and hotter my wings are, the better I like'em. Chicken Wings that were flapping at Ground Zero this past Sept 11, handing out videos and fliers exposing the 9/11 Neocon Flying Circus for what it was! Chicken Wings who's 9/11 activities made The Village Voice Chicken Wings that appeared on the syndicated Lionel radio show two days in a row and didn't mention the words Police State, Crop Circles, UFOs, or shadow rabbits! Chicken Wings that proudly held a "Controlled Demolition" sign in front of the White House! Chicken Wings that aren't afraid to use the words Zionist or Dancing Israelis! Chicken Wings who owe no allegiance to or boot lick any Corporative Masters. Chicken Wings who charge nothing for the information that they post (including archives). And above all, Chicken Wings that don't censor a person's name from an article simply because they don't see eye-to-eye. |
| Home | Submissions | Bookstore | Past Issues | Donations | Contact Us | |
| Copyright © 2004, WING TV ® All rights reserved. Website by pcStudios. | |