Convenient. That seems to be the most succinct buzzword to describe the London bombings on July 7, 2005. Afterall, with the incriminating Downing Street Memo still making waves across the UK’s front pages, and damning evidence pointing to Karl Rove as the CIA leaker in America; what better way to wipe the slate clean (at least temporarily) than to stage a convenient series of bomb blasts? Better yet, since London served as a focal point for the Downing Street Memo, why not directly lash-out at the “belly of the beast” and give those who were embarrassing Bush and Blair a little payback? How utterly timely.

But don’t just think those were the only reasons for this attack, because there is definitely more to the story. In the week leading up to this event, Britain’s Minister of Defense, John Reid, revealed that the UK was going to start significantly withdrawing troops from Iraq and Afghanistan in the next eighteen months. In other words, they were throwing in the towel and washing their hands of a war that the English people were thoroughly sick of (and opposed to right from the start).

So, you have to ask yourself: who most benefits from an attack in London? Is it the al-Qaeda “terrorists” that don’t want U.S. & British troops in their countries? Obviously not, because they knew any sort of attack would only serve to reinvigorate the propagandist’s war-frenzy, thus stalling any withdrawal.

In this sense, the London attacks only benefited one party – the Neo-con Zionists who want to keep a foothold in the Middle East. As Brian Kilmeade of Fox News commented, “This works to the Western world’s advantage, for people to experience something like this together.” So, “terrorism” isn’t simply an American problem now, especially considering the Bali attack, the Madrid train bombing, and now London’s assault.

How convenient. Of course blame was placed on “The Secret Organization of al-Qaeda in Europe,” a group no one had even heard of before. In fact, Matt Hutaff observed that, “The only al-Qaeda cell to ever be uncovered was a front for the Mossad. You’d think the perpetrators could at least come up with a clever new booga-booga name to grab headlines.”

But why mess with success? If the world’s citizenry falls for this same ruse time-after-time, why not keep beating a dead horse? Luckily, at least a few well-informed people know that the London attack was nothing more than a false-flag operation. Think about it. There was no reason for the “terrorists” to bomb the U.K. The Brits were quitting. Their people were utterly disgusted with the war and they wanted to wash their hands of their entire affair. Now, just like 9-11, they’re being dragged right back into the quagmire via the new “terrorism” hysteria.