First off, I'd like to commend you for having Professor Steven E. Jones as a guest on your program last Monday evening and for addressing the controversial topic of what truly caused the collapse of the WTC Twin Towers and Building 7. I would have to agree, however, with the caller "Mark" who called in to your program the following evening to complain that the professor was not given sufficient time and a fair opportunity to present his views as a guest on your show. As you correctly stated in your response to this caller, Professor Jones was indeed "unable to explain himself," but what you neglected to mention was the shameful and disgraceful reason for his failure. Professor Jones was unable to adequately present his alternative view of the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7 for the simple reason that YOU wouldn't give him a fair opportunity.

For instance, why wasn't the collapse video of Building 7 aired in accordance with the professor's wishes, and why wasn't the "experiment" that the professor suggested allowed to run its due course in that segment of your program? Though it was entirely appropriate that you should later apologize for this segment of your program with the BYU physics professor, as you did following the commercial break, it wasn't the professor's words or conduct during the short interview that warranted an apology, but rather your own! It wasn't that you were not "able to GET" your guest "to explain his pretty controversial allegations." It was simply that you didn't LET him explain them.

Last Thursday evening, in response to the caller "Steve" from West Virginia, you stated that you believe the World Trade Center buildings "fell down because planes hit them," but "if there's actual evidence to the contrary, we are ALWAYS a place where people can air that evidence." I think it's high time that you honor your word and your promises, Mr. Carlson, by issuing Professor Jones a public apology for NOT giving him a fair opportunity to air that evidence and by re-inviting him to appear once again as a guest on your show. There are hundreds of thousands and possibly millions of your viewers, including myself, who would very much like to hear more of what this man has to say.

But there are other promises you made that you should also seek to honor if you still look upon yourself as a man of integrity. In your response to the caller "Steve," after falsely stating that you "tried" with Professor Jones (when you did nothing of the sort), you also declared, "If there's someone else [who can put forward such evidence], you're welcome on our show."

There is indeed "someone else," Mr. Carlson, someone else who can convincingly explain to your viewers the TRUE cause of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, and one who has written an entire book on that subject. You should honor your promise by inviting him to appear as a guest on your program.

Victor Thorn has written a fascinating and provocative book, entitled 9-11 On Trial, which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the government's "official" version of why the World Trade Center towers collapsed cannot possibly be true. Plane impacts and the resulting jet fuel fires could not have caused the collapse of those massive, steel-frame structures. In the face of this failure to account for the collapses, one has to search for an alternative explanation and consider the hypothesis of a controlled demolition. In this book, he uses physics, mathematics, and expert testimony to present a rock-solid case that would stand up in any court of law and doesn't delve in the least into that dubious realm of "conspiracy theory," that is so easily discredited.

I urge you to take a very careful and open-minded look at this unimpeachable source of critical information and consider having Thorn and his co-host Lisa Guliani as guests on your show. I guarantee you that your viewers won't be disappointed, either in the credible information contained in this vitally important book or in these two guests, who are themselves experienced journalists. This is one of the most fascinating and eye-opening books that I've read in a very long time, and these guests are among the most compelling I've heard on radio or TV. I'm certain that the author has already sent you his contact information, but at the risk of redundancy, here again is his number: 814-272-0313.

So now, Mr. Carlson, you stand at a crossroads. You have a very simple choice that you now have to make. You can either honor your word and the promise you made that "if evidence ever does arise that the government lied substantially about what happened on September 11th, we'll be on it immediately, I promise" by inviting Victor Thorn to appear as a guest on your show, or you can choose NOT to honor your promise, and thereby prove to the world that your word means nothing. The choice is yours, and there is no avoiding it. If you choose not to have Victor Thorn as a guest on your program, as I expect you will not, you are a man without honor whose word means nothing.

You also stated on Thursday, in your response to "Steve" from West Virginia, that you "never lie on TV, ever." But I have very compelling evidence to the contrary, Mr. Carlson. Indeed, that statement that you just uttered is ITSELF a big lie, because of what transpired Wednesday evening between yourself and the caller "Mike" from New York. You purportedly "never lie on TV, ever," but you allow lies to go unchallenged on your program and, moreover, even go so far as to AGREE with them, which is exactly the same thing as you telling them yourself!

In the call-in segment that aired Wednesday evening, the caller "Mike" from New York falsely stated that "Building 7 was on fire for SEVERAL DAYS so this guy from BYU you had on is definitely a quack." The truth of the matter is that Building 7 collapsed on the afternoon of September 11, on the VERY SAME DAY that the attack occurred, so at most it was on fire for only several hours, not several days as this caller falsely alleges.

Not only did you not challenge this caller's erroneous statement, this LIE that he told - which you had plenty of time to check if you had wished to verify it for accuracy - you actually AGREED with it by saying, "Yeah, I know, Mike. I know that he was [a quack]." If anyone is a "quack" here, it is this charlatan "Mike," who made this preposterous and obvious misstatement of fact on your program, and YOU, Mr. Carlson - first for not challenging it, and secondly for agreeing with it. If you wish to retain even a shred of credibility and journalistic integrity, you will correct this falsehood at your earliest opportunity!

So in your opinion, those of us who question the official version of 9-11 and believe that the government was most likely complicit in the murder of 3,000 of its own citizens should just give up on America and leave our great country? Is this what you're suggesting, Mr. Carlson, that we should just hightail it out of here and abandon our nation like a bunch of disgusting and pathetic cowards?

No, what those of us who are burdened with the knowledge of the truth about 9-11 should actually be doing - instead of leaving the country as you are suggesting - is speaking out courageously and forcefully and enlightening as many people to this truth as is humanly possible, as Professor Jones was valiantly attempting to do as a guest on your program, despite your best efforts to subject him to ridicule. We must see to it that those responsible for the crime of 9-11 - whoever they may be and whatever high positions they may hold in our government - are exposed, brought to justice, and punished severely for their abominable crimes against innocent Americans, for this is the only hope we have for the survival of our nation and the only hope we have for our own personal survival. Only the TRUTH will defend our freedom and protect our rights as sovereign citizens!

It is those who deliberately impede the dissemination of this truth - as YOU are now doing by participating in its cover-up - who should leave our country, more so than all others, for it can truly be said that ANYONE who stands in the way of the truth being revealed about something as monstrous as the crime of 9-11 and who would PROTECT the perpetrators doesn't deserve to live in America!

I'm saying YOU'RE a bad person for participating in the cover-up, because that means you yourself are complicit in the crime. Get it?